Thursday, October 7, 2004

Your Thoughts: Is ''28 Days Later'' really sequel to ''28 Days''?

In light of reader feedback to our review of 28 Days Later, sequel to Sandra Bullock's hit 28 Days movie, we at It's News, Dammit! are interested in finding out just what you think. Is 28 Days Later really a sequel? Its title would certainly suggest that it is. But it does lack all of the heartfelt goodness that Bullock lent to the first film. What do you think?At It's News, Dammit!, your opinion matters. Here's what some of our readers think about 28 Days Later.


=============================


From: Jeremy Hunter (inlove_withska@hotmail.com)

To: webmaster@byzantinecommunications.com

Subject: It's News, Dammit! by Byzantine Communications Feedback
Duh 28 days later has no prequel, of course it would be a bad sequel of 28 days, because it's not a sequel! Just because they have similar names does NOT mean that 28 days later is a sequel of 28 days. The fact you can THINK they are even related is an embarrasement to human IQ. It shows nothing but the fact you are mentally inept. They have nothing to do with each other.



=============================
From: DZack (Danielzg1@aol.com)

To: webmaster@byzantinecommunications.com

Subject: It's News, Dammit! by Byzantine Communications Feedback
Hello. I'm wirinting this message to A Howard (I think his full name was Adam Howard) who wrote what had to be one of the stupidest and most ignorant articles I've ever seen. Adam Howard wrote about 28 days later, calling it the worst sequel ever becuase it had nothing to do with the movie 28 days. Adam, I hope your joking. That stupid Sandra Bullock movie has nothing to do with 28 later at ALL except for similar titles! Not only do they have none of the same actors, writers, directors, or anybody involved, but the movies couldn't be any more different! What, you saw the words "28 day" and just assumed they were realted? And then just proceded to critize 28 days later? And then, top it all off, you posted your article on the internet?!?!? GOOD LORD!!!!! I'm speachless. Uterly speachless. Please write back me and my God tell me i'm not the only person who noticed this!!!



=============================
From: Joe Smith (xdafez@anonymizer.com)

To: webmaster@byzantinecommunications.com

Subject: It's News, Dammit! by Byzantine Communications Feedback
I was wondering myself why this sequel sucked so much. Great review dude!
=============================
From: DZack (Danielzg1@aol.com)

To: webmaster@byzantinecommunications.com

Subject: It's News, Dammit! by Byzantine Communications Feedback
"28 Days later" had nothing to do with "28 days" except for the title! It wasn't a sequel! Its just a coincidence! Holy crap ahoward is retarded!



=============================
From: Sheila (Wolfkin33@hotmail.com)

To: webmaster@byzantinecommunications.com

Subject: It's News, Dammit! by Byzantine Communications Feedback
Your review on the movie "28 days later" was absolute shit. The Movie "28 days" with Sandra Bullock and the movie "28 days later" with Cillian Murphy, had NOTHING to do with each outher. 28 Days later was NOT the sequel to the Sandra Bullock movie. If your so incompetent that you cant even get simple facts right, than you shouldent be writing news. Get your facts straight befor reporting.



=============================


From: DZack (Danielzg1@aol.com)

To: webmaster@byzantinecommunications.com

Subject: It's News, Dammit! by Byzantine Communications Feedback
Its me again. And yes I will keep on writing to you I get some kind of response! What do I have to say? Why you should know that already! I'm here to say that the 28 Days Later article is comlete bullshit. it critisizes the movie for not haveing to do with the movie 28 Days, when in fact those 2 movies are in no ways related! Different actors, different dirrectors, different writers, MADE IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES! 28 Days Later isn't a fucking sequal!! Are you guys retarded? Now please write back or i'll just keep writing to you! Thanx!!



=============================
From: DZack (Danielzg1@aol.com)

To: webmaster@byzantinecommunications.com

Subject: It's News, Dammit! by Byzantine Communications Feedback
I stumbled upon your website and while i was reading the 28 Days Later article I noticed simething interesting......it's complete bullshit! 28 Days Later is not in any way, shape, or form a sequal to 28 Days! The movies have different actors, different writers, different directors, different prodcers, and THEY WERE MADE IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES! Is that enough clues for you guys? What do you assume t was a sequal just because they both have the words "28 Days" in them? I'm really perplexed by this article so please do me a favor and write back to me at Danielzg1@aol.com. Thank you.



=============================


From: Joe (fossilruins@hotmail.com)

To: webmaster@byzantinecommunications.com

Subject: It's News, Dammit! by Byzantine Communications Feedback
If you think that "28 days later" is a sequel to "28 days", you must have just came out of a coma yourself. You should retract this article due to your ignorance about movie names and that they may not be a sequel. "28 days later" is about a nightmare of a virus spreading through the lands. "28 days" is an idiot chick flick. THEY ARE NOT RELATED. Let's look at the understanding of a sequel: They tie the continuation of the new story to the old story. Does "28 days later" do that? NO! Why? THEY ARE NOT PART OF THE SAME STORY LINE! Just retract this article of your opinion (due to you are WRONG), and quit your job as being a film critic, and allow us to see REAL news of TRUTH, not misunderstandings of movie names and falsely believing all you know came from "28 days". I'm now going to go vomit from reading about your "thinking" that "28 days later" was a sequel to "28 days". Advice: Do some actual research about movies before you attempt to think that sequels are all related to movies that have nothing to do with the other.



=============================
From: Floyd Ong (mtb@hotmail.com)
To: webmaster@byzantinecommunications.com
Subject: It's News, Dammit! by Byzantine Communications Feedback
"28 Days Later - Worst Sequel Ever"
"Star of the 2000 hit 28 Days, Sandra Bullock doesn't even make an appearance in the sequel."
Is not the sequel to 28 days you dufus.